https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL8RkcHVqAQ


<center><iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qL8RkcHVqAQ" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe></center>


660
Does NATO countries have THE RESOURCES to keep "feeding" the war that THEY PROVOKED? NOT IN THE LONG-TERM. It's COSTLY. They doN'T have THE MONEY. President Putin is making NATO LEADERS out to be A BUNCH OF NUMBSKULLS. THE QUESTION IS THIS: "when" are they going to CUT THEIR LOSSES? NEXT QUESTION: HOW MUCH financial pain can they take? (Ha! Ha!) NOT TO MENTION "the humiliation" in the eyes of their respective taxpayers. They're supposed TO LEAD SO THAT THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNTRIES ARE "BETTER OFF" instead of "worse off" which is now the case. In the end, they're going to be happy to see the Ukraine be part of Russia after a referendum by the Ukrainian People willing chose to join Russia as did Crimea BECAUSE the Ukrainians know that with THE RUSSIAN PEACE will come prosperity. Reality be told, this whole conflict was IN THE MAKING since the end of communism in the early 1990s due to weak Ukrainian leadership. The Ukrainians were "teased" to join the EU + NATO when they knew better. With the EURO falling SO FAST IN VALUE, is it smart to join the EU? WouldN'T it be better to join the Russian-lead Commonwealth of Independent States? I think so. :D 
Ken, Toronto, CANADA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Independent_States