https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psZFTYOZwZw



<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/psZFTYOZwZw" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>


51 minutes ago
1,257  --------- 3,845
To SAY Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) had ALL THIS CASH (a good thing, NO? BECAUSE NOW they doN'T have ALL THAT CASH and "THAT" caused THE RUN ON THE BANK) AND SVB "LOCKED IT IN" into long term financial instruments so they COULD NO LONGER ACCESS 
ALL THAT CASH is WHAT CAUSED THE CRASH is HILARIOUSLY IMPROBABLE: this story takes us into THE LAND OF MAKEBELIEVE. 

That "PR" FICTIONAL STORY does NOT hold water. 

SO, WHAT'S the "likely" story? 

A Wells Fargo "repeat" with AN ENRON BLANKET on top of everything SOAKED IN EXPENSIVE PERFUME. (HA! HA!) 
Ken, Toronto, CANADA